Skip to content
Friendly disclaimer: flozi00 TechHub is a solo side-project next to a full-time job — personal learning notes, no official statements. Verify critical steps yourself.

GPU Buying Guide for LLM Inference (2026)

How to read GPU specs for LLM serving: model fit, peak bandwidth, interconnect, purchase quotes, used hardware and workload choices.

6 min readflozi00
aigpuhardwareh100blackwellbuying-guide
Skip to the full article
Watch · explore · understand

Make a GPU candidate pass three gates

Check a feasible memory budget before performance, then compare complete systems at useful output.

AI-assisted learning visualization · schematic article explanation

Step 1 / 3Check capacity before division

A bandwidth divided by weight-size estimate is meaningless for a configuration that cannot hold its weights and KV. Include the requested context and simultaneous sessions in the fit check.

WorkflowCurrent stepSelect a block to explain it
Define the serving workload
Choose model, context, concurrency and latency target.
Gate 1: memory fit
Weights + KV + activations and runtime reserves must fit.
  1. Define the serving workload Gate 1: memory fit
    size state
What to remember

Buy for a model and workload that fit and have been measured on the offered system.

Manufacturer peaks are ceilings, not serving benchmarks. This decision flow does not supply current purchase prices.

Terms and the complete walkthrough
Memory fit
All simultaneously required GPU state fits within the available memory.
Topology
The arrangement and bandwidth of connections among GPUs and hosts.
  1. Check capacity before division

    A bandwidth divided by weight-size estimate is meaningless for a configuration that cannot hold its weights and KV. Include the requested context and simultaneous sessions in the fit check.

  2. Benchmark the intended phase mix

    Small-batch decode often stresses bandwidth, while prefill and larger batches can stress compute. Multi-GPU communication adds a separate limit that depends on the actual topology.

  3. Compare usable systems

    A bare SXM module is not a complete server. Compare compatible systems, warranty and operating cost using measured useful throughput at the latency target.

All connections

  • Define the serving workload → Gate 1: memory fit: size state
  • Gate 1: memory fit → Gate 2: measured serving rate: only if feasible
  • Gate 2: measured serving rate → Gate 3: the complete system: test the topology
  • Gate 3: the complete system → Cost per useful output: ownership cost
  • Gate 2: measured serving rate → Cost per useful output: useful throughput
Set your own pace. Pause at any time or select a step directly.

Every GPU selection for LLM inference starts with model and KV-cache fit, then measures the required decode and prefill rates on the intended stack. This guide covers the relevant manufacturer specifications, interconnect, used-hardware risks and how to compare current purchase quotes. The VRAM arithmetic itself is covered in the linked deep dives.

1. How to Read GPU Specs for LLM Serving

Small-batch dense decode is often bandwidth-limited. Its idealized weight-only ceiling is memory bandwidth divided by weight bytes, provided the weights and KV cache fit. A 70B bf16 checkpoint needs about 140 GB before KV, so it does not fit on one 80 GB H100 SXM; dividing H100 bandwidth by 140 GB would describe an infeasible single-GPU setup. A 32.76B bf16 text checkpoint needs about 65.5 GB: the idealized weight-only ceilings are ~51 tok/s on H100 SXM (3.35 TB/s) and ~118 tok/s on HGX B200 (7.7 TB/s), before KV traffic or other limits. Prefill and larger batches can hit the compute ceiling. See the inference math article.

Capacity decides what fits — and what you can batch. VRAM must hold weights plus KV cache plus activations. Quantization trades accuracy for both capacity and effective bandwidth (bytes per token), so the cheapest "GPU upgrade" is often a format change rather than a purchase — see the quantization guide. A model that fits comfortably leaves room for longer context and bigger batches, which is the real lever for cost per served token. Work the numbers with the VRAM calculator and the KV-cache deep dive before you spend anything.

Read the sheet in this order: VRAM capacity (fit), memory bandwidth (small-batch decode), tensor throughput (prefill and batching), interconnect (multi-GPU communication), then power and cooling. Which limit binds depends on the workload.

2. Hardware tiers and comparable quotes

The table names a specific SKU where bandwidth differs by form factor. The figures are peak manufacturer specifications, not measured serving rates. A quote must identify the exact module, chassis, interconnect and warranty; HGX B200/B300 are normally quoted as systems, so a system price divided by eight is not a standalone card price.

TierGPU and form factorMemory per GPUPeak memory bandwidth per GPU
ConsumerGeForce RTX 509032 GB GDDR71.792 TB/s
WorkstationRTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition96 GB GDDR7 ECC1.792 TB/s
Previous generationA100 SXM 80 GB80 GB HBM2e2.039 TB/s
Data centerH100 SXM80 GB HBM33.35 TB/s
Data centerH200 SXM141 GB HBM3e4.8 TB/s
Data centerHGX B200 SXM180 GB HBM3e7.7 TB/s
Data centerHGX B300 SXM270 GB HBM3e7.7 TB/s

The RTX 5090 and workstation RTX PRO 6000 have the same peak memory bandwidth, but the latter has three times the memory capacity. The HGX B300 row follows NVIDIA's dedicated Blackwell Ultra datasheet; some NVIDIA reference-architecture material lists different maximum B300 memory/bandwidth figures, so check the exact offered system. Sources: RTX 5090, RTX PRO 6000, H200, Blackwell Ultra.

For an economic comparison, request current system quotes and divide total ownership cost by measured useful tokens over the service life. Include chassis, networking, power, cooling, support, utilization and resale value. Historic reseller listings are not reliable purchase prices.

Tensor parallelism splits layer operations across GPUs and requires communication during each forward pass. PCIe Gen5 x16 offers about 64 GB/s per direction (128 GB/s combined); NVIDIA quotes 600 GB/s for A100 NVLink 3, 900 GB/s for H100/H200 NVLink 4, and 1.8 TB/s for B200/B300 NVLink 5 as aggregate GPU-to-GPU link bandwidth. These link totals are not automatically usable for a particular all-reduce: topology, message size and software matter 1. HGX SXM systems provide NVSwitch connectivity; particular PCIe NVL cards can use compatible bridges.

TP=1 has no inter-GPU communication. For multi-GPU serving, compare measured latency and throughput of tensor, pipeline and expert parallel layouts on the offered topology. A study reported up to 4.5× throughput for a pipeline-oriented layout over its cross-node TP baseline on 16 H100s; that is a workload-specific result, not a general multiplier 2.

4. Risks by Tier

Used data-center cards (A100, ex-cloud H100s). Check the seller's warranty, return rights, firmware, thermal condition and module identity. SXM modules require a compatible baseboard and cooling; an SXM module alone is not a drop-in PCIe card. Ask for burn-in results and a working system configuration before treating a low module price as a bargain.

Consumer cards. The RTX 5090 has 32 GB GDDR7, no NVLink and a 575 W total graphics power rating. Its 32 GB cannot hold a 70B model even at ideal 4-bit payload size (35 GB before scales and KV). The RTX PRO 6000 Workstation Edition has 96 GB GDDR7 ECC. Multi-GPU PCIe performance depends on topology and runtime; verify power supply and cooling for the exact cards and chassis.

System realities at the top. NVIDIA's Blackwell Ultra datasheet lists HGX B300 GPU TDP configurable up to 1,100 W per GPU; actual node draw includes CPUs, networking, cooling and power conversion. Obtain the complete system's rated and measured power requirements from the OEM before planning facilities 3.

5. Decision Table by Workload

WorkloadPickWhy
Local models whose weights + KV fit in 32 GBRTX 50901.792 TB/s peak bandwidth; check actual quantized checkpoint size and reserve KV capacity
70B-class quantized or gpt-oss-120B-class MXFP4 modelsRTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition96 GB can hold many such checkpoints; check the exact format, KV budget and runtime
Used server hardware with supported chassisA100 80 GB SXM or PCIeCompare complete, tested systems and warranty terms, not bare module prices
Single-GPU long-context workloadH200 SXM or compatible H200 NVL system141 GB per GPU gives more KV headroom than 80 GB H100
Multi-GPU serving with tight latency targetsHGX H100/H200/B200/B300Benchmark the model and parallel layout on the chosen topology
Large KV pool and batchCapacity-first H200 141 GB or HGX B300 270 GBKV cache scales with context and concurrency; see the KV-cache guide

Verdict

Size the model, KV cache and runtime reserves with the inference calculator, then benchmark candidate systems at the target latency and concurrency. Compare current full-system quotes and operating costs for the measured workload. A roofline ceiling or an old listing cannot establish that one GPU is the cheapest choice.

Further Reading

Footnotes

  1. He, Zhao & Cao (ScitiX AI), "SiPipe" (arXiv:2506.22033, June 2025) — up to 4.5× throughput over pure TP in a cross-node setup with 16 H100 GPUs. ↩

  2. NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra datasheet, HGX B300 per-GPU specifications. ↩